The second round is as clear as any shallow pool. Two options. Of the Fujimorismo, with Keiko as a medium of his father, a proposal that represents the continuation of a criminal and corrupt regime. And he has no regrets and even has begun to threaten their opponents (the president of the Supreme Court for example). And secondly, Humala and now as 200 technical support and groupies, who are helping to build confidence in the "political center" with the risk that in this effort, lose all identity.
things clear for us: never by Keiko because you can not reward with a vote who destroyed the institutions, rights violated and denied with fury and cynicism. A Humala, demanding (in terms of these requirements can be effective ... of course) that poses a legislative agenda that eliminates as much as possible risks of authoritarianism.
a flat denial, and a possibility that can become an opportunity.
that Easter is for reflection, no nightmares or media crucifixions.
KAUS FAIR - Wednesday, April 20, 2011
0 comments:
Post a Comment